Well, Sub-Relativistic Garou is... a lot. I disagree with the need to take 0.001 m/s.
First, the speed of the snail can often be 0.01 m/s or more. This is wank.
Secondly, Garou's statement may have been an exaggeration. Or he didn't mean literally. Plus, he said "Barely." That is, he was moving and it was visible in his eyes. There was no absolute static.
There are also some questions about whether the spear itself is flying at a speed of 3 mach. The jet of water, of course, flies at that speed. But we have no evidence that the jet managed to accelerate the spear to the same speed (the spear is definitely flying slower than the jet itself, it is heavy). It managed to fly less than 10 meters (from 4 to 8, in different frames). But here I do not understand much. And if I'm right, then I don't know how to find the velocity of the spear in the end.
In my opinion, it would be most logical to take 0.02-0.03 m/s (or 0.025). But for the High-End I'll take 0.01 m/s.
Let's start.
Start[]
Low-End:[]
I will first use the method from the original calculation.
- Real speed of reference object: 762 m/s
- Apparent speed of reference object: 0.03 m/s
- Apparent speed of object of interest: 5 m/s
(762 / 0.03) × 5 = 127 000 m/s, or 373.5 Mach (Massively Hypersonic).
Mid-Low-End:[]
- Real speed of reference object: 762 m/s
- Apparent speed of reference object: 0.025 m/s (Average between 0.02 and 0.03)
- Apparent speed of object of interest: 5 m/s
(762 / 0.025) × 5 = 152 400 m/s, or 448.2 Mach (Massively Hypersonic).
Mid-End:[]
- Real speed of reference object: 762 m/s
- Apparent speed of reference object: 0.02 m/s
- Apparent speed of object of interest: 5 m/s
(762 / 0.02) × 5 = 190 500 m/s, or 560.29 Mach (Massively Hypersonic).
High-End:[]
- Real speed of reference object: 762 m/s
- Apparent speed of reference object: 0.01 m/s
- Apparent speed of object of interest: 5 m/s
(762 / 0.01) × 5 = 381 000 m/s, or 1120.5 Mach (Massively Hypersonic+).
Much better this way. To be honest, I don’t know why this method was taken now. Usually the reaction is given after the time of perception. This method has clearly increased all indicators. I'll try to take the classic method with "Distance / Speed = Reaction".
Low-End:[]
0.03 / 762 = 0.00003937007 seconds (High Hypersonic+ perception).
Mid-Low-End:[]
0.025 / 762 = 0.00003280839 seconds (High Hypersonic+ perception).
Mid-End:[]
0.02 / 762 = 0.00002624671 seconds (Massively Hypersonic perception).
High-End:[]
0.01 / 762 = 0.00001312335 seconds (Massively Hypersonic perception).
Even better.
RESULTS[]
- Original calc method:
- Low-End = 373.5 Mach (Massively Hypersonic)
- Mid-Low-End = 448.2 Mach (Massively Hypersonic)
- Mid-End = 560.29 Mach (Massively Hypersonic)
- High-End = 1120.5 Mach (Massively Hypersonic+)
- Method through reaction:
- Low-End = 0.00003937007 seconds (High Hypersonic+ perception)
- Mid-Low-End = 0.00003280839 seconds (High Hypersonic+ perception)
- Mid-End = 0.00002624671 seconds (Massively Hypersonic perception)
- High-End = 0.00001312335 seconds (Massively Hypersonic perception)
I think the best option is Low or Med-Low-End via reaction.