This thread is intended for users to link to new blog post calculations, to relay them to the community, and have them evaluated by the calculation group, without contacting the members individually.
To evaluate important off-site calculations, preferably copy them to blog posts in this wiki (while giving credit to the original calcer) and ask for evaluations in the normal manner. You can also create a separate thread in the calc group discussion forum section, and then post a link to it here, but that tends to be far less efficient.
Any further discussion should not continue here, but rather strictly take place in the linked blog posts or content revision threads, with the exception that calc group members should note which calculation blogs that they have responded to. Also, users should preferably post the name of the verse that a calculation refers to, in order to generate interest.
All members of the calculation group are requested to follow, bookmark, and regularly inspect this thread.
Also, when writing a calculation blog, always inform about the exact episode/chapter that the feat occurs in, as well as the time when the feat occurs, if it happens within a video segment. This makes it easier for the calc group members to verify if the calculation has been done correctly.
Do not put punctuations at the end of blog titles. It messes up the link and leads to a blank page.
As our calc group members are people too, we realize that their work is time-consuming. Given the daily volume of calculations that the team is tasked with evaluating, it is important that you give your requests proper classifications, as detailed in the official Calculation Evaluations and Requests Instructions page.
In addition, if different calc group members disagree about whether or not a calculation is reliable, or it uses unusual or uncommon calculation methods, preferably start a corresponding thread in the calc group forum, post a link to it within the blog, and inform the calc group members in question about it via their message walls. This is done so they can more easily discuss the issue with each other by receiving notifications.
If there exist several calculations for a specific feat that have all been evaluated and accepted, but give conflicting results, the matter of which one that is most reliable should be first be discussed in the calc group forum by the calc group members before any changes are applied to the relevant character profiles. The calculation that is finally accepted should then be added to the related verse page calculation section, and the rejected versions removed.
Do not bump your requests, especially not repeatedly. You are only allowed to ask again if your calculation was left over from a previous evaluation thread, or if you have modified a calculation after a calc group members or somebody else has given you instructions.
If your request has already been properly evaluated by the calc group, please update your post to state this in a bolded font, as this makes it easier for calc group members to tell which requests that have been overlooked.
I apologize in advance if I'm coming off as pushy or anything of the like, but could someone who is able to make blog posts make one for this calc I did? It can't necessarily be evaluated if it's stuck as being in a sandbox.
Yeah, I'll have them done soon, I just didn't want anyone to unnecessarily do the calcs and end up with 2 of the same thing. So I left it here. I'll finish the rest of them before keeping it here then.
Description: A couple of AP feats, these were done a while ago but unfortunately I haven't been able to complete the full list that was requested and don't want to keep people waiting. So I've left a note at the bottom for any staff members that read as I likely wont be able to complete the list any time soon.
Description: Basically, since this verse is currently lacking in people keeping it in place, these two calcs have been used in profiles for years despite them not being accepted. Thus, I'm requesting for them to be evaluated now to see if they were valid all along.
Priority: 2 or 3 (Probably not TOO worth it in the grand scheme of things since kart racers aren't really viable. Really did this because of one faulty rating in a Chuck E. Cheese's profile that I just HAD to contest.)
Verse: I honestly don't even know where to categorize this thing.