Right now were at in immovable impasse where most of those in the discussion are in favor of making certain revision changes (and there is strong evidence to make them), however, the only active staff memeber in the discussion is in my eyes being very biased and ignoring well thought out and valid arguments to upgrade certain aspects of characters for what honestly seems like just personal bias' as I said. I don't want to sound like I'm attacking this person because they've contibuted very solid arguments of their own in regards to other aspecs of the revision that I agree with, and I'm happy they are participating, but it just seems like with certain characters there's a personal bias going on.
We would really appreciate it if you could spare some time to read the ongoing discussion and chime if possible.
I think you could get 1-B towards the upper ends due to the amount of dimensional transcendence going on. On a replay, even at the highest level the civilization just ascends to higher dimensions, so High 1-B and 1-A was a bit unfounded.