VS Battles Wiki

We have moved to a new external forum hosted at https://vsbattles.com

For information regarding the procedure that needs to be exactly followed to register there, please click here.

READ MORE

VS Battles Wiki
VS Battles Wiki
(Created page with "For he record, I agree that no harm was intended here, that these are unusual circumstances that do not fit with our usual procedures, and that [https://vsbattles.fandom.com/i...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
For he record, I agree that no harm was intended here, that these are unusual circumstances that do not fit with our usual procedures, and that [https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index.php?title=Giga_Bowser&diff=6646080&oldid=6645845 this] is a minor and accepted calculation-based change in the first place, so I am not sure where exactly to draw the line for whether or not it should be allowed. It seemed rather harmless, but the calc group should usually decide which calculated version of a feat that should be used if both of them have been accepted.
+
For he record, I agree that no harm was intended here, that these are unusual circumstances that do not fit with our usual procedures, and that [https://vsbattles.fandom.com/index.php?title=Giga_Bowser&diff=6646080&oldid=6645845 this] is a minor and accepted calculation-based change in the first place, so I am not sure where exactly to draw the line for whether or not it should be allowed. It seemed rather harmless, but the calc group should usually decide which calculated version of a feat that should be used/is most reliable, if both of them have been accepted.
   
 
Anyway, it is probably best if we drop this subject, yes.
 
Anyway, it is probably best if we drop this subject, yes.

Latest revision as of 02:19, 13 July 2020

For he record, I agree that no harm was intended here, that these are unusual circumstances that do not fit with our usual procedures, and that this is a minor and accepted calculation-based change in the first place, so I am not sure where exactly to draw the line for whether or not it should be allowed. It seemed rather harmless, but the calc group should usually decide which calculated version of a feat that should be used/is most reliable, if both of them have been accepted.

Anyway, it is probably best if we drop this subject, yes.