No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Again, both of you are ignoring context. |
Again, both of you are ignoring context. |
||
| − | Mention the timing when you argue on his behalf, and your entire 'maybe he's embaressed' falls apart. |
+ | Mention the timing when you argue on his behalf, and your entire 'maybe he's embaressed or something' falls apart. |
Like I said, this sounds like a Mikoto situation (minus the aftermath), where a popular member does bannable things but gets their ban reduced for being popular. I bet if I looked at the previous RVT I would find several kudos on posts defending Upgrade to a consistently wild degree. |
Like I said, this sounds like a Mikoto situation (minus the aftermath), where a popular member does bannable things but gets their ban reduced for being popular. I bet if I looked at the previous RVT I would find several kudos on posts defending Upgrade to a consistently wild degree. |
||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 25 February 2020
Again, both of you are ignoring context.
Mention the timing when you argue on his behalf, and your entire 'maybe he's embaressed or something' falls apart.
Like I said, this sounds like a Mikoto situation (minus the aftermath), where a popular member does bannable things but gets their ban reduced for being popular. I bet if I looked at the previous RVT I would find several kudos on posts defending Upgrade to a consistently wild degree.