FANDOM


 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="quote">The Wright Way wrote:<br />Only it doesn't only warrant a warning. We don't de things like that. We decided things in a case by case basis and the basis here clearly suggests a ban is needed.</div>
 
<div class="quote">The Wright Way wrote:<br />Only it doesn't only warrant a warning. We don't de things like that. We decided things in a case by case basis and the basis here clearly suggests a ban is needed.</div>
a ban isn't needed, there are other terms and a warning more perfectly fits this description more than a ban, it's not what "I" want, it's what the rules goes to show, these "this guy thinks he's above everything" is a lie and a jack up. they do say knowledge is dangerouus (in this case i know the rules) but at most I estimate a warning if it's seen as wrong, of course i can't get a warning but watch shadow and the others do and make something much worse with all their warnings way more over seven and get away with it. I advised Maverick to talk it over and there's nothing wrong that, and when he said no, I said if it happens i'm cutting ties, that's no threat whatsoever. i'm not attacking him or anybody, just letting them know the potential result of reporting me, why would I be a ally to people who are trying to drive me out over something that clearlywon't drive me out based on the rules? of course lay down the neutrality I did have with them. 
+
a ban isn't needed, there are other terms and a warning more perfectly fits this description more than a ban, it's not what "I" want, it's what the rules goes to show, these "this guy thinks he's above everything" is a lie and a jack up. they do say knowledge is dangerouus (in this case i know the rules) but at most I estimate a warning if it's seen as wrong, of course i can't get a warning but watch shadow and the others do and make something much worse with all their warnings way more over seven and get away with it. I advised Maverick to talk it over and there's nothing wrong that, and when he said no, I said if it happens i'm cutting ties, that's no threat whatsoever. i'm not attacking him or anybody, just letting them know the potential result of reporting me, why would I be a ally to people who are trying to drive me out over something that clearly won't drive me out based on the rules? of course lay down the neutrality I did have with them. 
shadow and the likes do the following
 
   
disrespects, attack, dox and cyberbully the people, users, mods and other groups.
 
   
derailing a thread to a literaal personal dilemma (far worse then talking about dark gaia which someone else instigated btw)
+
i'm pretty sure AKM and Antvasima already agreed on a warning. that's it.
 
bug out when their bluff is called out. 
 
 
and i'm here chiling like a villain whether i get a warning, temp ban, ban, or perm ban or not. if i'm let off the hook i'm definitely not doing the same thing. and the sonic group over here seems very hostile on not letting me get a warning and how I wonder why that is?.they definitely went bonkers when i exposed Corgi,Bacchus and Shadow
 
 
and i'm pretty sure AKM and Antvasima already agreed on a warning
 

Latest revision as of 15:56, December 4, 2019

The Wright Way wrote:
Only it doesn't only warrant a warning. We don't de things like that. We decided things in a case by case basis and the basis here clearly suggests a ban is needed.

a ban isn't needed, there are other terms and a warning more perfectly fits this description more than a ban, it's not what "I" want, it's what the rules goes to show, these "this guy thinks he's above everything" is a lie and a jack up. they do say knowledge is dangerouus (in this case i know the rules) but at most I estimate a warning if it's seen as wrong, of course i can't get a warning but watch shadow and the others do and make something much worse with all their warnings way more over seven and get away with it. I advised Maverick to talk it over and there's nothing wrong that, and when he said no, I said if it happens i'm cutting ties, that's no threat whatsoever. i'm not attacking him or anybody, just letting them know the potential result of reporting me, why would I be a ally to people who are trying to drive me out over something that clearly won't drive me out based on the rules? of course lay down the neutrality I did have with them. 


i'm pretty sure AKM and Antvasima already agreed on a warning. that's it.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.