FANDOM


 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br />I was going to wait, but yes; she is definitely Mikoto/Hans/Ted Ed after looking at that. Furthermore, Ted Ed also debated and said the exact same things on my wall on other wikis is another indicator. Mikoto is surprisingly not as malicious sounding as she used to be, but a sock is still a sock. So she should still be banned. I will do so.</div>
 
<div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br />I was going to wait, but yes; she is definitely Mikoto/Hans/Ted Ed after looking at that. Furthermore, Ted Ed also debated and said the exact same things on my wall on other wikis is another indicator. Mikoto is surprisingly not as malicious sounding as she used to be, but a sock is still a sock. So she should still be banned. I will do so.</div>
Perhaps because it's not "Mikoto" to begin with? Seriously, the only reason this whole issue has stated is out of sheer paranoia in Matt's part just saying that the user behind it is the "so-called" Mikoto without absolutely anything to prove it beyond having similar tastes, this sort of stuff has happened before and isn't solid criteria and we know it, as I could have the exact same taste as Ever, yet I'm not actually him, for example.
+
Perhaps because it's not "Mikoto" to begin with? Seriously, the only reason this whole issue has started is out of sheer paranoia in Matt's part just saying that the user behind it is the "so-called" Mikoto without absolutely anything to prove it beyond having similar tastes, this sort of stuff has happened before and isn't solid criteria and we know it, as I could have the exact same taste as Ever, yet I'm not actually him, for example.
   
 
While using a sock is bad, if the ban behind it has no real reason beyond the above, then she can just be asked to stick to one account and move on as if nothing happened.
 
While using a sock is bad, if the ban behind it has no real reason beyond the above, then she can just be asked to stick to one account and move on as if nothing happened.

Latest revision as of 06:55, December 2, 2019

DarkDragonMedeus wrote:
I was going to wait, but yes; she is definitely Mikoto/Hans/Ted Ed after looking at that. Furthermore, Ted Ed also debated and said the exact same things on my wall on other wikis is another indicator. Mikoto is surprisingly not as malicious sounding as she used to be, but a sock is still a sock. So she should still be banned. I will do so.

Perhaps because it's not "Mikoto" to begin with? Seriously, the only reason this whole issue has started is out of sheer paranoia in Matt's part just saying that the user behind it is the "so-called" Mikoto without absolutely anything to prove it beyond having similar tastes, this sort of stuff has happened before and isn't solid criteria and we know it, as I could have the exact same taste as Ever, yet I'm not actually him, for example.

While using a sock is bad, if the ban behind it has no real reason beyond the above, then she can just be asked to stick to one account and move on as if nothing happened.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.