No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
From what I saw, it being used redundantly. The average Lion and Bear's lifting strenght far surpassed each others average weight for instances. |
From what I saw, it being used redundantly. The average Lion and Bear's lifting strenght far surpassed each others average weight for instances. |
||
− | Also, basically, the same things for the elephants and T-rex. |
+ | Also, basically, it is the same things for the elephants and T-rex. |
− | It seems more trouble than it worth to allow weight equalized and size equalized, in the long run, since some willl abuse it and the equaliazation would trivalized the |
+ | It seems more trouble than it worth to allow weight equalized and size equalized, in the long run, since some willl abuse it and the equaliazation would trivalized the lifting strenght system too. |
Simply using research is enough and a better solution. |
Simply using research is enough and a better solution. |
Latest revision as of 22:43, 22 August 2019
GojiBoyForever wrote:
But that's the thing animal lifting strength varies which is why they specified equal weight.
But that's the thing animal lifting strength varies which is why they specified equal weight.
From what I saw, it being used redundantly. The average Lion and Bear's lifting strenght far surpassed each others average weight for instances.
Also, basically, it is the same things for the elephants and T-rex.
It seems more trouble than it worth to allow weight equalized and size equalized, in the long run, since some willl abuse it and the equaliazation would trivalized the lifting strenght system too.
Simply using research is enough and a better solution.