No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I hoped we wouldn't need to do this again, but [https://vsbattles.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:2568898 Gallavant] has admitted that he purposedfully ignored a timeframe and then took down one of his calculations in order to make a scaling more consistent with other feats, and now he said he will try to pursue the |
+ | I hoped we wouldn't need to do this again, but [https://vsbattles.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:2568898 Gallavant] has admitted that he purposedfully ignored a timeframe and then took down one of his calculations in order to make a scaling more consistent with other feats, and now he said he will try to pursue the original result due to the old one being contested. |
This is not just making a mistake - he is admitting he manipulated the true result he obtained and deleted his calculation and replaced it with another one to make a feat seem like it isn't an outlier. This is a serious violation as far as transparency and honesty goes. |
This is not just making a mistake - he is admitting he manipulated the true result he obtained and deleted his calculation and replaced it with another one to make a feat seem like it isn't an outlier. This is a serious violation as far as transparency and honesty goes. |
||
Latest revision as of 21:14, 16 January 2019
I hoped we wouldn't need to do this again, but Gallavant has admitted that he purposedfully ignored a timeframe and then took down one of his calculations in order to make a scaling more consistent with other feats, and now he said he will try to pursue the original result due to the old one being contested.
This is not just making a mistake - he is admitting he manipulated the true result he obtained and deleted his calculation and replaced it with another one to make a feat seem like it isn't an outlier. This is a serious violation as far as transparency and honesty goes.