(Created page with "@DDM @Glassman The only thing those two have in common is "19" it isn't even following the "adjective-noun" formula. This constant spam of "these are sockpuppets" is getting...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
@Glassman |
@Glassman |
||
| − | The only thing those two have in common is "19" |
+ | The only thing those two have in common is "19." Their names aren't even following the "adjective-noun" formula. This constant spam of "these are sockpuppets" is getting tiresome. Unless you have evidence that they are socks, we can't go around banning people because you speculate they may be a sock. |
Unless they are exclusively "X FRA" to many very similar threads and were created within a day or so's timeframe, then I really don't like this. Seems like a massive witchhunt. |
Unless they are exclusively "X FRA" to many very similar threads and were created within a day or so's timeframe, then I really don't like this. Seems like a massive witchhunt. |
||
Latest revision as of 09:34, 16 January 2018
@DDM
@Glassman
The only thing those two have in common is "19." Their names aren't even following the "adjective-noun" formula. This constant spam of "these are sockpuppets" is getting tiresome. Unless you have evidence that they are socks, we can't go around banning people because you speculate they may be a sock.
Unless they are exclusively "X FRA" to many very similar threads and were created within a day or so's timeframe, then I really don't like this. Seems like a massive witchhunt.