(Created page with "<div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br />@Jaakubb and @Dargoo I never said "All storms feats are like this" I simply said we can't just ignore every storm feat in exist...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br />@Jaakubb and @Dargoo I never said "All storms feats are like this" I simply said we can't just ignore every storm feat in existence and just assume it isn't combat applicable. It's heavily case by case and we literally went over that discussion back in 2018.</div> |
<div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br />@Jaakubb and @Dargoo I never said "All storms feats are like this" I simply said we can't just ignore every storm feat in existence and just assume it isn't combat applicable. It's heavily case by case and we literally went over that discussion back in 2018.</div> |
||
| − | I never said we should ignore them all. I'm saying that a storm feat isn't valid by virtue of being a storm feat. |
+ | I never said we should ignore them all. I'm saying that a storm feat isn't valid simply by virtue of being a storm feat. Some still apply. |
| + | |||
| − | <div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br/>But when the God of Thunder does it, it's usually combat applicable</div> |
+ | <div class="quote">DarkDragonMedeus wrote:<br />But when the God of Thunder does it, it's usually combat applicable</div> |
I disagree. Storm feats should only be considered combat applicable when the character directly produces the kinetic energy of the storm, like with all might's detroit smash. Most storms are just a chain reaction instigated by cooling. |
I disagree. Storm feats should only be considered combat applicable when the character directly produces the kinetic energy of the storm, like with all might's detroit smash. Most storms are just a chain reaction instigated by cooling. |
||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 13 January 2020
@Jaakubb and @Dargoo I never said "All storms feats are like this" I simply said we can't just ignore every storm feat in existence and just assume it isn't combat applicable. It's heavily case by case and we literally went over that discussion back in 2018.
I never said we should ignore them all. I'm saying that a storm feat isn't valid simply by virtue of being a storm feat. Some still apply.
But when the God of Thunder does it, it's usually combat applicable
I disagree. Storm feats should only be considered combat applicable when the character directly produces the kinetic energy of the storm, like with all might's detroit smash. Most storms are just a chain reaction instigated by cooling.
Also could you please address my points on freezing instead of retreating back into the exact same argument? That's not how cooling works. In fiction, they are either using "energy telekinesis" or using a refrigerant. Give me a more reasonable interpretation. For reference, using a refrigerant does make the vibration of the particles decrease, decreasing the heat, and it has already been established that using a refrigerant does not require any outside energy source.