Talk: Staff Discussion/@comment-27123758-20190715005002/@comment-29462228-20190715012803

Latest revision as of 01:28, 15 July 2019

Promestein wrote:
It's a different thread, is the thing. This isn't about just MGQ. It's also about CoC, and more broadly, other verses with high sexual content that aren't yet on the wiki. We need to decide on where to draw the line.

Also, any arguments revolving around "but this is gross and/or morally bad" aren't worth much. There's plenty of morally reprehensible verses on this wiki already.

This is a question of the sexual content, its place in the relevant story / game, any effects these things may potentially have on the wiki, and, again, where to draw the line when it comes to the first two things.

I am neutral.

But, assuming this point is true: Also, any arguments revolving around "but this is gross and/or morally bad" aren't worth much.

I think we can draw the line as long the profiles are clean of NFSW and the story is coherent enough to have proper statistics then the profile can be allowed. In this sense, I am proposing all or nothing.

In this sense, I think we won't have bias based on subjectivity.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 But, assuming this point is true: '''Also, any arguments revolving around "but this is gross and/or morally bad" aren't worth much.'''
-I think we can draw the line as long the profiles are clean of NFSW and the story is coherent enough to have proper statistics then the profile can be allowed. In this sense, I am propoing all or nothing.
+I think we can draw the line as long the profiles are clean of NFSW and the story is coherent enough to have proper statistics then the profile can be allowed. In this sense, I am proposing all or nothing.
 In this sense, I think we won't have bias based on subjectivity.