Talk: Content Revision/@comment-34652527-20181103032259/@comment-34652527-20181216212317

Latest revision as of 21:27, 16 December 2018

@Numbersguy If you agree with Fate Manipulation, then why not Truth of the Universe? Also if you are referring to abstract existence for Giygas, what I said up there is describing Type 2 Abstract. I made a mistake up there as I wasn’t aware that there were types. Type 1 describes them as existing as an abstraction and that they lack a true physical form. But even so, that can be debatable. How is Time stop an oversight? Or some form of gameplay mechanics?

@SSBXeno573 How is it not Passive if it’s by mere presence alone?

@Gyronutz Why do you disagree with Fate Manipulation if Truth of the universe is ok?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 @Numbersguy
-If you agree with Fate Manipulation, then why not Truth of the Universe? Also if you are referring to abstract existence for Giygas, what I said up there is describing '''Type 2 Abstract.''' I made a mistake up there as I was wasn’t aware that there were types. Type 1 describes them as existing as an abstraction and that they lack a true physical form. But even so, that can be debatable.
+If you agree with Fate Manipulation, then why not Truth of the Universe? Also if you are referring to abstract existence for Giygas, what I said up there is describing '''Type 2 Abstract.''' I made a mistake up there as I wasn’t aware that there were types. Type 1 describes them as existing as an abstraction and that they lack a true physical form. But even so, that can be debatable.
 How is Time stop an oversight? Or some form of gameplay mechanics?