Talk: Content Revision/@comment-34066793-20171228100840/@comment-24383490-20180102163749

Latest revision as of 16:52, 2 January 2018

I would prefer to include brief explanations for why the claims are deemed false within the regulation text. Anyway, I suppose that SSJRyu1 can respond if he wishes.

Revision as of 16:37, 2 January 2018 (view source) Antvasima (Message Wall \| contribs) (Created page with "I would prefer to include brief explanations for why the claims are deemed fals within the regulation text. Anyway, I suppose that SSJRyu1 can respond if he wishes.")		Latest revision as of 16:52, 2 January 2018 (view source) Antvasima (Message Wall \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I would prefer to include brief explanations for why the claims are deemed ~~fals~~ within the regulation text. Anyway, I suppose that SSJRyu1 can respond if he wishes.	+	I would prefer to include brief explanations for why the claims are deemed false within the regulation text. Anyway, I suppose that SSJRyu1 can respond if he wishes.