Talk: Content Revision/@comment-28510017-20191121160356/@comment-28510017-20200110125316

Latest revision as of 12:53, 10 January 2020

Okay, thanks for the reply! I was a bit conservative at the time because of the composite rule being layed out, but I guess it's fine since it's not really a composite per say.

Revision as of 12:53, 10 January 2020 (view source) Colonel Krukov (Message Wall \| contribs) (Created page with "Okay. I was a bit conservative at the time because of the composite rule being layed out, but I guess it's fine since it's not really a composite per say. ")		Latest revision as of 12:53, 10 January 2020 (view source) Colonel Krukov (Message Wall \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Okay. I was a bit conservative at the time because of the composite rule being layed out, but I guess it's fine since it's not really a composite per say.	+	Okay, thanks for the reply! I was a bit conservative at the time because of the composite rule being layed out, but I guess it's fine since it's not really a composite per say.